In this article we will provide Brief definition of Big O with couple of cheat sheet from web. Brief definition of Big O: Big O notation is a mathematical notation that describes the limiting behavior of a function when the argument tends towards a particular value or infinity. It is a member of a family Continue reading 'Big O Cheat Sheet'. Big-O Cheat Sheet for Some Data Structures and Algorithms. Big-O Cheat Sheet Generated December 10, 2013. Brandon Amos 1 Searching Algorithm Data Structure Time Complexity Space Complexity.
When measuring the efficiency of an algorithm, we usually take into account the time and space complexity. In this article, we will glimpse those factors on some sorting algorithms and data structures, also we take a look at the growth rate of those operations. Descargar juan gabriel discografia.
First, we consider the growth rate of some familiar operations, based on this chart, we can visualize the difference of an algorithm with O(1) when compared with O(n2). As the input larger and larger, the growth rate of some operations stays steady, but some grow further as a straight line, some operations in the rest part grow as exponential, quadratic, factorial.
In order to have a good comparison between different algorithms we can compare based on the resources it uses: how much time it needs to complete, how much memory it uses to solve a problem or how many operations it must do in order to solve the problem: Fsbuild 2.4 download.
Sorting Algorithms | Space Complexity | Time Complexity | ||
Worst case | Best case | Average case | Worst case | |
Bubble Sort | O(1) | O(n) | O(n2) | O(n2) |
Heapsort | O(1) | O(n log n) | O(n log n) | O(n log n) |
Insertion Sort | O(1) | O(n) | O(n2) | O(n2) |
Mergesort | O(n) | O(n log n) | O(n log n) | O(n log n) |
Quicksort | O(log n) | O(n log n) | O(n log n) | O(n log n) |
Selection Sort | O(1) | O(n2) | O(n2) | O(n2) |
ShellSort | O(1) | O(n) | O(n log n2) | O(n log n2) |
Smooth Sort | O(1) | O(n) | O(n log n) | O(n log n) |
Tree Sort | O(n) | O(n log n) | O(n log n) | O(n2) |
Counting Sort | O(k) | O(n + k) | O(n + k) | O(n + k) |
Cubesort | O(n) | O(n) | O(n log n) | O(n log n) |
In this chart, we consult some popular data structures such as Array, Binary Tree, Linked-List with 3 operations Search, Insert and Delete.
Data Structures | Average Case | Worst Case | ||||
Search | Insert | Delete | Search | Insert | Delete | |
Array | O(n) | N/A | N/A | O(n) | N/A | N/A |
AVL Tree | O(log n) | O(log n) | O(log n) | O(log n) | O(log n) | O(log n) |
B-Tree | O(log n) | O(log n) | O(log n) | O(log n) | O(log n) | O(log n) |
Binary SearchTree | O(log n) | O(log n) | O(log n) | O(n) | O(n) | O(n) |
Doubly Linked List | O(n) | O(1) | O(1) | O(n) | O(1) | O(1) |
Hash table | O(1) | O(1) | O(1) | O(n) | O(n) | O(n) |
Linked List | O(n) | O(1) | O(1) | O(n) | O(1) | O(1) |
Red-Black tree | O(log n) | O(log n) | O(log n) | O(log n) | O(log n) | O(log n) |
Sorted Array | O(log n) | O(n) | O(n) | O(log n) | O(n) | O(n) |
Stack | O(n) | O(1) | O(1) | O(n) | O(1) | O(1) |
The order of growth of the running time of an algorithm gives a simple characterization of the algorithm’s efficiency and also allows us to compare the relative performance of alternative algorithms.
Below we have the function n f(n)
with n as an input, and beside it we have some operations which take input n
Zip2john. and return the total time to calculate some specific inputs.
n f(n) | log n | n | n log n | n2 | 2n | n! |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10 | 0.003ns | 0.01ns | 0.033ns | 0.1ns | 1ns | 3.65ms |
20 | 0.004ns | 0.02ns | 0.086ns | 0.4ns | 1ms | 77years |
30 | 0.005ns | 0.03ns | 0.147ns | 0.9ns | 1sec | 8.4×1015yrs |
40 | 0.005ns | 0.04ns | 0.213ns | 1.6ns | 18.3min | — |
50 | 0.006ns | 0.05ns | 0.282ns | 2.5ns | 13days | — |
100 | 0.07 | 0.1ns | 0.644ns | 0.10ns | 4×1013yrs | — |
1,000 | 0.010ns | 1.00ns | 9.966ns | 1ms | — | — |
10,000 | 0.013ns | 10ns | 130ns | 100ms | — | — |
100,000 | 0.017ns | 0.10ms | 1.67ms | 10sec | — | — |
1’000,000 | 0.020ns | 1ms | 19.93ms | 16.7min | — | — |
10’000,000 | 0.023ns | 0.01sec | 0.23ms | 1.16days | — | — |
100’000,000 | 0.027ns | 0.10sec | 2.66sec | 115.7days | — | — |
1,000’000,000 | 0.030ns | 1sec | 29.90sec | 31.7 years | — | — |